Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31

Thread: Will Robots Take My Job?

  1. #21
    Merry Christmas
    Type
    INFP
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    near a castle
    Posts
    3,655
    19%, no worries

  2. #22
    schlemiel Faust's Avatar
    Type
    INTP
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,421
    Quote Originally Posted by BarIII View Post
    WTH
    Your vocation here is in jeopardy. But you'll always have something the robots don't.
    "All my heroes are dead" - John Zorn

    "It's not selfish if you hate yourself"

  3. #23
    Member Thoth's Avatar
    Type
    INFP
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    AHJ 2006
    Posts
    820
    Robots are the ultimate expression of objective socialism qua communism. If you prescribe to such social theory you should praise the rise of your robotic overlords.

    That said, my job is at 8.2% threat. Fuck you Robot Stalin!

  4. #24
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    656
    ,
    Last edited by mara; 10-25-2017 at 06:33 PM. Reason: can't find the delete button

  5. #25
    Meae Musae Servus Hephaestus's Avatar
    Type
    INTP
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    12,214
    Some interesting things:

    Google Spider: 0 results
    Traffic Controller: 0 results
    Police officer: 9.8%
    Judge/Magistrate: 40%


    Ha. Hahaha. Ha.

    Constitutional right to trial by jury of your peers, but no right to trial by a human.

    I have astoundingly mixed feelings about this.
    For some, "how", not "why", is the fundamental unit of measure for curiosity. This divergence is neither parallel, nor straight. Where one might have a "why?-5" problem, it might only be a "how?-2" question. But then, there are also many things where the "why?" is immediately obvious but the "how?" is best measured in centuries of perpetual wonder. Both approaches have their drawbacks.

    If one is superior, the other is unaware of it.

    --Meditations on Uncertainty Vol ξ(x)

  6. #26
    push to stutardepid itch's Avatar
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    781
    Quote Originally Posted by KOI View Post
    I have astoundingly mixed feelings about this.
    I'm totally stoked. This is happening.
    stupid pancakes.

  7. #27
    Meae Musae Servus Hephaestus's Avatar
    Type
    INTP
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    12,214
    Quote Originally Posted by itch View Post
    I'm totally stoked. This is happening.
    Noooooooooo! I want to vote for Dunkelzahn!
    For some, "how", not "why", is the fundamental unit of measure for curiosity. This divergence is neither parallel, nor straight. Where one might have a "why?-5" problem, it might only be a "how?-2" question. But then, there are also many things where the "why?" is immediately obvious but the "how?" is best measured in centuries of perpetual wonder. Both approaches have their drawbacks.

    If one is superior, the other is unaware of it.

    --Meditations on Uncertainty Vol ξ(x)

  8. #28
    push to stutardepid itch's Avatar
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    781
    Quote Originally Posted by KOI View Post
    Noooooooooo! I want to vote for Dunkelzahn!
    There's still plenty of time 'til 2057.
    stupid pancakes.

  9. #29
    Member Pyropyro's Avatar
    Type
    INTP
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    43
    2.7%

    Biochemists and Biophysicists (closest to what I do)

    Not bad

  10. #30
    Meae Musae Servus Hephaestus's Avatar
    Type
    INTP
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    12,214
    Quote Originally Posted by itch View Post
    There's still plenty of time 'til 2057.
    It's the wait that gets me, y'know?
    For some, "how", not "why", is the fundamental unit of measure for curiosity. This divergence is neither parallel, nor straight. Where one might have a "why?-5" problem, it might only be a "how?-2" question. But then, there are also many things where the "why?" is immediately obvious but the "how?" is best measured in centuries of perpetual wonder. Both approaches have their drawbacks.

    If one is superior, the other is unaware of it.

    --Meditations on Uncertainty Vol ξ(x)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •