Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect...

  1. #1
    Member Aurast's Avatar
    Type
    INTP
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    501

    James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect...

    Fascinating

    "James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher" is an English sentence used to demonstrate lexical ambiguity and the necessity of punctuation, which serves as a substitute for the intonation, stress, and pauses found in human speech. In human information processing research, the sentence has been used to show how readers depend on punctuation to give sentences meaning, especially in the context of scanning across lines of text. The sentence is sometimes presented as a puzzle, where the solver must add the punctuation.

    The example refers to two students, James and John, who are required by an English test to describe a man who, in the past, had suffered from a cold. John writes "The man had a cold" which the teacher marks as being incorrect, while James writes the correct "The man had had a cold." Since James' answer was right, it had had a better effect on the teacher.

    The sentence can be understood more clearly by adding punctuation and emphasis:

    James, while John had had "had", had had "had had"; "had had" had had a better effect on the teacher.

    In each of the five "had had" word pairs in the above sentence, the first of the pair is in the past perfect form. The italicized instances denote emphasis of intonation, focusing on the differences in the students' answers, then finally identifying the correct one.

  2. #2
    igKnight Hephaestus's Avatar
    Type
    INTP
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    9,142
    You can play similar games with 'that'--the biggest difference being that you can string a more indefinite number of 'that's together.
    --Mention of these things is so taboo, they aren't even allowed a name for the prohibition. It is just not done.

  3. #3
    In it to win it 99Problems's Avatar
    Type
    INTP
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Oklahoma coast
    Posts
    479
    The membership quit reading this thread when it had had enough of had hads.

  4. #4
    igKnight Hephaestus's Avatar
    Type
    INTP
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    9,142
    Are you saying that had had had had had had had had had had had has had a deleterious effect on the reader?
    --Mention of these things is so taboo, they aren't even allowed a name for the prohibition. It is just not done.

  5. #5
    In it to win it 99Problems's Avatar
    Type
    INTP
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Oklahoma coast
    Posts
    479
    Quote Originally Posted by Hephaestus View Post
    Are you saying that had had had had had had had had had had had has had a deleterious effect on the reader?
    I am saying that that is what I think.

  6. #6
    igKnight Hephaestus's Avatar
    Type
    INTP
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Ceti Alpha V
    Posts
    9,142
    I think that that that that you think it was was--well, what it is is that that that you thought it was.
    --Mention of these things is so taboo, they aren't even allowed a name for the prohibition. It is just not done.

  7. #7
    Now we know... Asteroids Champion ACow's Avatar
    Type
    INTP
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    2,267
    Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo

  8. #8
    In it to win it 99Problems's Avatar
    Type
    INTP
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Oklahoma coast
    Posts
    479
    Potato potato potato potato potato potato potato potato potato potato potato potato potato

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •