Page 1 of 58 1231151 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 576

Thread: Toxic Aluminium in the vaccines

  1. #1
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    810

    Toxic Aluminium in the vaccines

    I have borrowed the following information which came from three presentations by Dr Suzanne Humphries who has some very interesting things to say about vaccines. I strongly recommend that anyone who cares about their health or the health of loved ones watches the presentations which i will post in the thread.

    I will post medical studies and the reference numbers so that you can look them up on pubmed.com if you want to check them out for yourself

    Aluminium is used as an 'adjuvant' in many vaccines which is to say that it is used to provoke an immune response in your body.

    When it is said to many doctors that aluminium is harmful to the body they will often answer that your body receives far more aluminium through food then it does through vaccines however your body reacts differently to aluminium when it enters the body through intramuscular injections as opposed to being ingested.

    When aluminium is ingested much of it is excreted from the body in stools and urine but when it is injected into muscle it provokes a response from the immune system.

    When it is injected into muscle, such as in a vaccine, aluminium is eaten up by macrophages which then carry it across the blood brain barrier. Once inside the brain it is able to make epigenetic alterations to the functions of genes. This can then create unintended consequences known as ‘non-specific effects’.

    Your General Practitioner will not be able to tell you what epigenetic effects aluminium will have on the genes of the person vaccinated, neither will they be able to tell you of any non-specific effects that may occur as a result of that because they are not a geneticist or a toxicologist or a virologist, therefore they are not experts on vaccines; they simply do as they are told by the government or they risk losing their job

  2. #2
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    810
    The focus of the vaccine industry research has been on whether or not their vaccines produce the desired result for example a polio vaccine combatting polio. They have not carried out extensive research on the wider consequences of vaccines caused by ingredients such as aluminium and the non-specific effects it causes

    ‘Aluminium is extremely proinflammatory, pathalogical and a genotoxic element that is particularly deleterious to the normal homeostatic operation of brain cells, especially at the level of normal cytoplasmic and genetic activities that utilize phosphate’- Bhattarcharjee 2013 PMID 23764827.

    There is a lot of phosphate utilisation in the brain and aluminium has been found to be a neurotoxin at vaccine relevant doses (see Shaw 2013 PMID 23932735).

    A new study has shown that the brain is not immunologically separate from the rest of the body as previously assumed (see Louveau 2015 PMID 26030524). This finding will require an entirely new look at brain function from the medical fraternity and the latest thought on vaccine function may not be up to date with this latest research.

    The reasoning for this is that concentrations of aluminium have been found to increase as the arteries get closer to the brain (Battarcharjee). This is because aluminium is attracted to the brain and is carried across the blood brain barrier by macrophages.

    There is currently a lack of comparable studies comparing non-vaccinated children with vaccinated children to establish what non-specific effects may be caused by vaccines, and by some estimates as many as half the paediatric vaccinations include aluminium.

  3. #3
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    810
    When adverse reactions to vaccines do occur they are often difficult to link to the vaccines because sometimes it takes time for those adverse effects to manifest; see for example Hamza 2012 PMID 21601704 where it took four months for the adverse effects, including subtle liver damage, to fully manifest in the test subjects.

    Aluminium received into the body through intra-muscular injection of a vaccine is not comparable to aluminium ingested, for example through food, in terms of how it impacts the body because intra-muscular injection of aluminium stimulates a response from the immune system. According to studies, some known effects of aluminium passed into the body through intra-muscular injection include:

    -Translocates from the muscle to the brain
    -Is attracted to the brain and accumulates there. It increases brain inflammation and activates brain microglia (Alexandrov 2015 PMID 26265215 & Bhattacharjee 2013 PMID 23764827)
    -Passes through the blood brain barrier inside macrophages (Banks 1983 PMID 6139573)
    -In Bank’s study cited above the blood brain barrier became very permeable after the injections of aluminium
    -Enters the brain and epigenetically alters gene function; it changes how DNA functions by affecting which genes are opened and which are closed (Hamza 2012 PMID 21601704)
    -Is a neurotoxin at vaccine relevant doses (Shaw 2013 PMID 23932735)
    -Changes how enzymes work, because enzymes need to be the right shape to work and aluminium can change that (Shaw 2013 PMID 23932735)
    -Stimulates a response from the immune system (it forces it to over-react)
    -Can go into the lymph nodes
    -Can react with our proteins
    -Harms cell function (it damages cell membranes and myelin and disrupts the ability of cells to regulate and to communicate with each other)
    -Has an inflammatory effect
    -Enters our T-cells which is what our body uses to fight infection
    -Accumulates in the body for years at a time (Shaw/Tomjilenovic 2013 PMID 23932735)
    -Binds to nucleotides (i.e. genetic material in the nucleus) and changes how they work (see Kawahara 2011 PMID: 21423554)
    -It creates a bias towards Th2 which then affects how our immune system functions and deals with future infections (well published, numerous articles on this)
    -It induces autoimmune reactions (Shaw 2014 PMID 25349607)
    -It blocks neuronal signalling
    -Is an antigen on its own (Levy 1998 PMID 9629674)
    -Impairs cognitive and motor functions

  4. #4
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    810
    If someone says that the doses of aluminium in vaccines are too small to be harmful then correct them and inform them that aluminium has been found to be a neurotoxin at vaccine relevant doses, see: Shaw 2013 PMID 23932735.

    When we speak about ‘minimal risk levels’ for aluminium in the body we must consider that no studies have been carried out using a control of non-vaccinated children and therefore it is not possible to establish safe levels of aluminium exposure.

    Another area of concern should be the discovery of endogenous retroviruses in vaccines and the long-term health implications of that for people who have been vaccinated:

    ‘Manufacture of childhood vaccines in human fetal cell lines, with its associated retroviral and human DNA fragment contaminants, fulfills all of the necessary requirements as a primary trigger for autism disorder’
    -Dr Theresa Deisher 2014, Impact of Environmental Factors on the Prevalence of Autistic Disorder After 1979, Sept 2014, J Pub Health Epid Vol 6(9), 271-284

    When we consider the role of environmental factors in health it is important to keep in mind that what our genes are exposed to affects their function, and aluminium in vaccines affects gene function.

    In the same way that Thimerosol (a mercury derivative used in vaccines as a preservative) has been removed in recent years from many vaccines over health fears (but not the flu vaccine), it is very possible that aluminium will also be removed in the near future as more research is conducted into the non-specific effects it has on the human body. However this will be of no help to any children already vaccinated with vaccines containing aluminium (hydroxide and phosphate).

  5. #5
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    810
    The following are four studies Dr Humphries recommends that parents familiarise themselves with. It is easy to go on pubmed.com and type in the reference number and pull up the study

    The studies can sometimes be a dense read but Dr Humphries says they will reward the effort; they cover a range of problems caused by aluminium entering the body through intra-muscular injection:

    -Verstraeten 1997 PMID 9264541
    -Kawahara 2011 PMID 21423554 – link between aluminium and the pathogenesis of Alzheimers disease: The integration of the aluminium and amyloid cascade hypotheses
    -Exley 2013 PMID 23982047 – Human exposure to aluminium
    -Shaw 2014 PMID 25349607 – Aluminium induced entropy in biological systems: implications for neurological disease

    Another good website to check out is vaccinepapers.org which has a brochure that contains many medical studies that cover the effects that aluminium has when injected into the human body; see here: http://vaccinepapers.org/brochure/

  6. #6
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    810
    Vaccines don't cause autism? Think again

    The secret vaccine courts are paying out billions of dollars to vaccine damaged children

    Vaccine Court Awards Millions to Two Children with Autism
    By David Kirby
    01/14/2013 12:03 pm ET Updated Mar 16, 2013

    The federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, better known as “vaccine court,” has just awarded millions of dollars to two children with autism for “pain and suffering” and lifelong care of their injuries, which together could cost tens of millions of dollars.
    The government did not admit that vaccines caused autism, at least in one of the children. Both cases were “unpublished,” meaning information is limited, and access to medical records and other exhibits is blocked. Much of the information presented here comes from documents found at the vaccine court website.
    Some observers will say the vaccine-induced encephalopathy (brain disease) documented in both children is unrelated to their autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Others will say there is plenty of evidence to suggest otherwise.
    What’s more, these cases fit the pattern of other petitions, (i.e., Poling and Banks) in which the court ruled (or the government conceded) that vaccines had caused encephalopathy, which in turn produced permanent injury, including symptoms of autism and ultimately an ASD diagnosis.
    And most of these children now have taxpayer dollars earmarked for applied behavioral analysis (ABA), an effective therapy specifically designed to treat ASD.
    Meanwhile, parents, grandparents, friends and neighbors of both children testified they were developmentally normal, if not advanced for their age when they developed seizures, spiking fevers and other adverse reactions to their vaccines. According to these eyewitnesses, the children never fully recovered, and instead began losing vocabulary, eye contact and interest in others around them, all classic symptoms of regressive autism.
    In the first case, involving a 10-year-old boy from Northern California named Ryan Mojabi, the parents allege that “all the vaccinations” received from 2003-2005, and “more specifically, measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccinations,” caused a “severe and debilitating injury to his brain, described as Autism Spectrum Disorder (‘ASD’).”
    The parents, who did not want to be interviewed, specifically asserted that Ryan “suffered a Vaccine Table Injury, namely, an encephalopathy” as a result of his MMR vaccination on December 19, 2003.” (“Table injuries” are known, compensable adverse reactions to immunizations.)
    Alternatively, they claim that “as a cumulative result of his receipt of each and every vaccination between March 25, 2003 and February 22, 2005, Ryan has suffered . . . neuroimmunologically mediated dysfunctions in the form of asthma and ASD.”
    In vaccine court, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services acts as the defendant and Justice Department attorneys act as counsel.
    In 2009, Ryan’s case was transferred to vaccine court’s Autism Omnibus Proceedings, according to the docket. A year-and-a-half later, the government conceded that MMR vaccine had indeed caused Ryan’s encephalopathy.
    HHS agreed that “Ryan suffered a Table injury under the Vaccine Act — namely, an encephalitis within five to fifteen days following receipt,” of MMR, records show. “This case is appropriate for compensation.”
    Whether HHS agreed with Ryan’s parents that his vaccine-induced brain disease led to ASD is unknown. The concession document is under seal.
    Read full article here http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-...b_2468343.html

  7. #7
    malarkey oxyjen's Avatar
    Type
    INtP
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,050
    I'm more hung up on the fact that you posted all this in the span of four minutes. Are you a demon

  8. #8
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    810
    Dr. Suzanne Humphries Lecture on vaccines and health FULL PART ONE


  9. #9
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    810
    Quote Originally Posted by oxyjen View Post
    I'm more hung up on the fact that you posted all this in the span of four minutes. Are you a demon
    Like i say i have borrowed the info

    but seriously check it out if you are pro-science because the science is building around the fact that aluminium in vaccines is harmful

    50% of the rise in autism prevalence is unexplained


  10. #10
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    810
    Dr. Suzanne Humphries Lecture on vaccines and health FULL PART TWO


Similar Threads

  1. Children's Vaccines Should be Mandatory
    By Perdix in forum The Pub
    Replies: 119
    Last Post: 11-08-2016, 01:00 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •