Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37

Thread: Geoengineering

  1. #1
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    960

    Geoengineering

    The US congress has finally held a hearing on the issue of geoengineering which lends some weight to claims by so called 'conspiracy theorists' that there are in fact large scale 'chemtrailing' operations already going on in the skiies above our heads. Could we finally be seeing a move towards official disclosure on this issue? Check out the congressional hearing here:

    Subcommittee on Environment and Subcommittee on Energy Hearing - Geoengineering: Innovation, Research, and Technology
    Date:
    Wednesday, November 8, 2017 - 10:00am
    Location:
    2318 Rayburn House Office Building
    Subcommittees:

    Subcommittee on Energy (115th Congress)
    Subcommittee on Environment (115th Congress)



    Hearing charter

    Opening Statements:

    ​Full Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas)

    Environment Subcommittee Chairman Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.)

    Energy Subcommittee Chairman Randy Weber (R-Texas)

    Witnesses:

    Dr. Phil Rasch, chief scientist for climate science, Laboratory Fellow, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory [Truth in Testimony]
    Dr. Joseph Majkut, director of climate policy, Niskanen Center [Truth in Testimony]
    Dr. Douglas MacMartin, senior research associate, Cornell University [Truth in Testimony]
    Ms. Kelly Wanser, principal director, Marine Cloud Brightening Project, Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, University of Washington [Truth in Testimony]

    115th Congress
    https://science.house.gov/legislatio...geoengineering

  2. #2
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    960
    Professor David W. Keith. Geoengineering


  3. #3
    know nothing pensive_pilgrim's Avatar
    Type
    INTP
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    4,575
    I totally called this, I predicted that "geoengineering" was gonna become a big buzzword and would eventually be the solution to global warming. I might have predicted it for 2017 but still.

  4. #4
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    960
    Quote Originally Posted by pensive_pilgrim View Post
    I totally called this, I predicted that "geoengineering" was gonna become a big buzzword and would eventually be the solution to global warming. I might have predicted it for 2017 but still.
    'global warming'?

    didn't they stop using that term and replace it with 'climate change' when no warming was found to have happened?

    Is geoengineering only about controlling the weather or can it be weaponised and have other applications. Of course as they disclose that they are indeed spraying us with toxic particulates like aluminium and barium they will tell us that they are doing it for our own good to fight 'climate change'

    Here is the CIA chief speaking about the weaponisation of geoengineering:


  5. #5
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    960
    The harms caused by spraying metal nanoparticles into our atmosphere are incalculable

    here is an activist demanding that the EPA investigate the issue:


  6. #6
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    960
    What does a Former FBI Special Agent and Chief have to say about ChemTrails? You will be Surprised!


  7. #7
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    960
    Atmospheric Geoengineering

    Anonymous report confirms climate and weather manipulation experiments conducted by the US and its allies over the past decades Julian Rose

    Chemtrails unveiled

    Much suspicion has been aroused by unusual cloud formations and abnormal jet trails in the upper atmosphere over the past decade. I have personally witnessed hundreds of days of ‘engineered’' jet trails and clouds, both in the UK and in Poland. However, it has proved extremely difficult to obtain any information about the phenomenon from official sources. When challenged, the normal answer is “nothing unusual is happening.”

    This turns out to be very far from the truth. While I concentrate most of this article on just one recent example of professional research on the topic, there have been hundreds of both official and unofficial documents exploring and exposing the military and civil aviation antics responsible for spraying layer upon layer of toxic aerosol “chemtrails” in the sky above our heads on an almost daily basis for the past ten years.

    These events go unreported by the mainstream media and governments remain silent. This collusion, whether intentional or otherwise, keeps us in the dark with regard to a grand geo-engineering experiment that has the effect of hobbling our health and severely disrupting the natural environment. And we would have been lost but for the internet.

    The Belgium based Belfort Group has brought together more than seven years of research and fact finding on the activities that have become largely known as “Chemtrails”. At an international symposium at Delft University of Technology in Ghent, 29 May 2010, the Belfort Group enlisted Dr Coen Vermeeren, a senior aeronautics engineer, to address the issue. Vermeeren based his presentation on a 300 page scientific report entitled [1] “Case Orange: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies.” According to Vermeeren, the authors of the report are “a group of scientists/inside who have chosen to remain anonymous.”

    In his talk, Dr Vemeeren frankly admits to the existence of “persistent contrails”; he said:

    “We also know that chemtrails do exist because we do the spraying; for crops, for example, and we know that they have been spraying for military purposes. So chemtrails is not new. We know about it.”
    From weather manipulation to geoengineering

    The Case Orange report reveals the existence of publicly available material indicating that various forms of geoengineering have been going on for “at least 60 years.” Early examples include the 'cloud seeding' UK war operations in Germany during World War Two and the US attempts to dislodge the North Vietnamese during the Vietnam War. However, these pale into insignificance compared with the extensive nature of current activities.

    Controversy over the potentially detrimental effects of such activities on both the environment and human health led to 'Environmental Modification' (En Mod) weaponry being banned under the auspices of “The UN Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques” in 1987. It is not clear whether this ban was ever fully enforced. However, interest in En Mod soon gained prominence when global warming warnings and accompanying environmental stress issues attracted global scientific interest [2].

    The Case Orange report cites a number of US patents for the invention of a “Specific contrail generation apparatus for producing a powder contrail having maximum radiation scattering ability for a given weight of material. The seeding material consists of 85 percent metallic particles and 15 percent colloidal silica and silica gel in order to produce a stable contrail that has a residence period of up to 1 to 2 weeks.”

    Then in 2009, the publication of a report entitled “Modification of cirrus clouds to reduce global warming” put the case for further geo-engineering strategies [3]. These all had the stated intent of creating a layer of reflective cloud capable of bouncing back the sun's rays to prevent unwanted terrestrial climate heating. The report states that the findings of The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change supports the proposition outlined in the Hughes Aircraft Patent 1991 on stratospheric seeding for reduction of global warming. Hughes was later bought by Raytheon, The US government's private defence contractor. This is the same company that acquired the contract to build HAARP (The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) in Gakona, Alaska.
    The industrial-military complex for complete weather control against global warming

    HAARP is a large 180 antennae grid that projects powerful electromagnetic pulses to heat a specific point in the earth's ionosphere. This has the effect of creating electromagnetic frequencies that can be bounced back to earth at desired locations, causing major disruption to weather and geophysical elements, even deep underground [4, 5]. Up to 3.6 billion watts can be generated by HAARP, heating the ionosphere to over 50 000 degrees and “lifting a 30 square kilometre area of the ionosphere, thereby changing localised pressure systems or even altering the route of jet streams.”

    The Case Orange report cites evidence that Raytheon could develop the capacity to “exercise a form of complete “weather control”, a situation bearing a marked similarity to the Monsanto corporation's stated ambition “to control the food chain.” It is noteworthy that there are currently more than 500 ‘climate ready’ genetically modified plant gene patents awaiting licensing approvals in Washington and Brussels. ‘Climate Ready’ GM seeds and plants are promised by their creators to be capable of producing a crop under both flood and drought conditions.

    The human rights and environmental watchdog 'ETC Group' describes the atmospheric geoengineering developments as follows: “The roll-out of 'Plan B' (a reference to the use of geoengineering if other efforts to curtail emissions should be deemed ineffective) is being skilfully executed: Prominent high level panels sponsored by prestige groups, a spate of peer-reviewed articles in science journals and a line up of panicked politicians in northern countries, nodding nervously in agreement as scientists testify about the “need to research Plan B.”

    Rady Ananda states at the end of his paper [6]: “Case Orange ties-in a 1996 report by top military personnel in the US entitled “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” [7] with details such as government spraying schedules, chemical orders, correct nomenclature used in airline operation manuals and calls for geoengineering by economists, to support its notion of “heavy involvement of governments at top level in climate control projects.” Ananda continues [6]: “Owning the Weather in 2025 provides a specific time line for the use of En Mod technologies in cooperation with the Weather Modification Association, a business-government group promoting the 'beneficial' (my emphasis) uses of environmental modification [8]:

    2000-2025 Use chemicals for atmospheric seeding by civilian (as well as military) aviation

    2004 Create smart clouds through nanotechnology, with exponential increase from 2010

    2005 Introduce carbon black dust.”
    The UN enlisted in geoengineering military combat against climate

    In 2007, The World Meteorological Organisation (of the United Nations) published a statement that included “Guidelines for Planning of Weather Modification Activities.” This document clearly implicates the UN in plans to conduct aerosol spraying activities on a wide scale.

    In a section of the Case Orange report dealing with 'the bare necessities of geoengineering through cloud generation for the survival of the planet' the authors state: “Our investigation team comes to the conclusion that climate control programs, controlled by the military but approved by governments, are silently implemented in order to avoid the worst case scenario they obviously do not want. The two basic instruments are temperature control through the generation of artificial clouds and manipulation of the ionosphere through ionosphere heaters.

    “Both remain basically military combat systems with the option to go into the offensive if deemed necessary. However, since several ionospheric heaters are installed at various places around the globe, one can assume that there is wide cooperation between governments in order to reach climate targets by 2025: controlling the weather and the planet.” (my emphasis).

    The spraying schemes seem to be organised in a logical pattern so that the whole of Europe is covered in a 3 day period. Coloured maps of Europe indicate when each regime is to take place.

    In the report's section entitled “Recommendations”, the authors state: “Persistent chemtrails have a devastating impact on eco-systems on this planet and to quality of life in general.” The authors call for the full disclosure of the current En Mod activities to the public, as well as for all civil aviation laws to be abided by.
    Moratorium on geoengineering activities

    One encouraging piece of information is that, in response to policy interest in geoengineering as a means to control climate, the sub-committee of the United Nations Convention of Biodiversity proposed, in May 2010, a moratorium on geoengineering activities [9]. This proposal will be heard at the Tenth Conference of Parties to the UN Convention of Biodiversity in Nagoya, Japan in October this year (2010).

    The Case Orange report further states that the US permits open air testing of chemical and biological weapons, which overrides the civil law mentioned earlier in this article. The authors paraphrase the permissive law thus: “The Secretary of Defense may conduct tests and experiments involving the use of chemical and biological agents on civilian populations.” It seems that ‘national security’ concerns can be used by the President to overrule environmental and public health considerations. Is the same true in Europe?

    I have provided a basic outline of the main evidence arising from the Case Orange report. It makes an important contribution to opening up otherwise secretive agendas that have no place in any self-declared democracy. Other significant reports include an important paper by Dr Ilya Perlingieri, entitled “The Consequences of Toxic Metals and Chemical Aerosols on Human Health” [10]. She states: “Over the past decade, independent testing of Chemtrails around the country have shown a dangerous, extremely poisonous brew that includes: barium, nano-aluminium coated fibreglass (known as CHAFF), radioactive thorium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, dessicated blood, mould spores, yellow fungal mycotoxins, ethylene dibromide and polymer fibres. Barium can be compared to the toxicity of arsenic [11] and is known to adversely affect the heart. Aluminium has a history of damaging brain function.” I need hardly add that ethylene dibromide is a highly toxic agricultural pesticide.

    Now that we are party to this information we must to act on it. It is vital that we support the moratorium taking place in Japan this October. Do write to your MPs and tell them that these global activities are not the stuff of 'conspiracy theories'; and that they are taking place without public consultation and without any attempt to warn of their likely repercussions.

    Article first published 20/09/10

    References

    Dr Coen Vermeeren symposium speech, Delft University of Technology, 29 May 2010, http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7299427
    “Top science body calls for geoengineering 'plan B', Catherine Brahic: New Scientist, 1/9/2009, http://www.newscientist.com/article/...p-science-body
    Mitchell DL and Finnegan W. Modification of cirrus clouds to reduce global warming” Environmental Research Letters 2009, 4, 30 October 2009, http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/4/4/045102
    “About HAARP from a paper by Belitsos”, Radical Wisdom, 14 July 2010, http://radwisdom.com/2010/07/14/chem...ove-the-earth/
    For further reading on HAARP see Prof. Michel Chossudovsky: “Owning The Weather” Global Research http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...ext=va&aid=319
    “Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails” by Rady Ananda, 30 July 2010, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=20369
    Col Tamzy J.House, et al. “Weather as a Force Multiplier: “Owning the Weather in 2025”, Department of Defense U.S. Air Force, 17/06/1996. Publicly released August 1996. Reproduced at Federation of American Scientists: http://www.fas.org/spp/military/doco...15/v3c15-1.htm
    Weather Modification Website: http://www.weathermodification.org/
    Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, "In-Depth Review of the Work on Biodiversity and Climate Change, Draft Recommendations, Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nationa Environmental Programme, UNEP/CBD/SBTTA/l.9, 15/05/2010. http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/sbst...14-L-09-en.pdf
    “The consequences of toxic metals and chemical aerosols on human health”, Ilya Perlingieri, 12 May 2010, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=19047
    See Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA) http://www.pesticideinfo.org/Detail_...Rec_Id=PC41174
    http://www.i-sis.org.uk/atmosphericGeoengineering.php

  8. #8
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    960
    Busting Open the Chemtrail Denial Subterfuge
    By JULIAN ROSE

    As we swing into the New Year, many are going to be feeling more than a little impatient that the perpetrators of the toxic air-born emissions which create engineered clouds over vast areas of our skies, still remain largely anonymous.

    Anonymous by name, but no doubt to be found within the ranks of military industrial proponents and psychopathic secret society hegemons: those who hide behind the 1991 Hughes Aircraft atmospheric aerosol patent. The patent that formalized an engineering technique which alters the climate and sickens the planetary population with its debilitating fall-out.

    There is a red line test that almost instantly reveals people's awareness about these, and related, military activities. Just put the question “What do you think about 9/11? And how do you feel about chemtrails?” You might be surprised to find that those who you consider reasonably intelligent and quite thoughtful individuals, appear to be neither when asked to think about these two actualities.

    This response to the first question would be quite typical “It's obvious, 9/11 was an al-Qaeda mission led by bin Laden. There's nothing suspicious about it.” And on chemtrails “They don't exist”.

    What one runs into when confronted with such an unquestioning response, creates a genuine human dilemma. Where can one turn if fellow human beings are unwilling to examine, in any detail, incriminating evidence that stands behind such crime's against humanity?

    However, things take on a vastly magnified significance once one seeks to solicit the truth from those well placed to actually know something about what goes on in the higher echelons of military defense planning, or amongst those concerned with environmental protection, weather forecasting and civil aviation. The silence in these quarters is deafening.

    Atmospheric aerosol geoengineering (chemtrails) is one of the most crudely in-your-face debasements of civil justice and environmental and human health, ever to have been enacted upon mankind – outside of outright war.

    Even if one thought it might be happening as some form of defense against 'global warming', one could hardly fail to realize that nobody ever asked if you, or anyone else for that matter, were in agreement for such an experiment to be undertaken in the sky above your home, and from one end to the other of your country of residence.

    The mind tries to grasp how it could be that the smothering of our skies with toxic engineered clouds, a process that has been going on for at least two decades, could fail to elicit any response from the majority of mortals living on planet Earth. Yet most claim 'not to have noticed' these activities, and others have told me “I never look up”.

    What an indictment concerning the state of imprisonment that great swathes of humanity try to make their peace with.

    So what do we actually know about the manufacture of these aerosols? Who is behind them – and how are they dispersed in the atmosphere?

    In short, we know that in 1975 the US navy was granted a patent which describes the dispersion method for a 'powdered contrail' able to sustain itself in the atmosphere for long periods. And in 1990 the US Department of Defense used the word 'chemtrails' as the title of a chemistry manual for pilots attending the US Air Force Academy. A manual that teaches how to make these aerosols. This is verifiable information in the public domain - so that does away with the 'conspiracy theory' factor straight away.

    We know, from public records, that airborne chemical spraying – in one form or another – has been going on for at least sixty years. Early examples include cloud seeding during World War Two and in Vietnam during the US invasion of the late 1960's.

    Atmospheric geoengineering has come about and continues to operate, as a military project. In the 1980's it became known as an 'Environmental Modification Weapon' (En Mod), and due to the widespread controversy this aroused, such techniques were banned under the auspices of UN Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques, 1987.

    However this UN edict is not enshrined in law, and it is quite clear that whoever is behind the atmospheric weaponry, is not unduly phased, and continues to order the mining and smelting of vast tonnages of aluminium as well as other components such as barium and titanium; to be processed into a substance which is then spread around the world via aircraft flying at around twenty five to thirty thousand feet.

    If anyone 'official' has anything to say at all about this activity, it is that “there is some discussion about using geoengineering techniques to counter the affects of sunlight as a cause of global warming.” We know that British and US governments have, since 2009, been 'discussing' the use of geoengineering to combat climate change via the spreading aerosols in the atmosphere.

    In recent years more and more independent research projects, both in Europe and the USA, have revealed the presence of aluminium, barium and titanium in water courses far from any likely factory processing zones. In Germany and Switzerland recent research has revealed alarmingly high levels detected at many sites; and in France nanotech chemtrail 'filaments' have recently been recorded at locations all over the country.

    Most of what I have described up until now is not new knowledge, but needs repeating so as to remind us of the extent to which the chemtrails phenominum has become a ubiquitous feature of modern life.

    But why, given this fact, haven't we nailed the perpetrators years ago? How could something so deadly be practiced on a global scale and yet manage to remain almost completely unidentified at source?

    For example, how many millions of tons of alluminium are used in the course of a year's spraying?
    Where does it come from? Who organizes the shipments – the processing and the delivery to airports? How come governments remain totally silent?

    The answer to these questions – that are out there – remain sketchy. Maybe because just a handful of dedicated self resourced activist researchers have, up until now, led the way in identifying just about all we know about these activities. That needs to change. Many more need to be involved and the exposure needs to be ramped up ten fold.

    There is still some controversy concerning exactly how the spraying is carried out. What technology is used? Who fits it? Is it fitted to military and civilian commercial jet airlines ? And if so – how many people working in the industry know about this, but remain quiet?

    I have been researching atmospheric aerosol geoengineering for the past ten years or more*(see end) and I have increasingly come to suspect that the high altitude dispersal method is achieved via mixing nanoparticulates into jet fuels and thereby into the exhaust gases of the aircraft's jet engines. Observation alone, shows that the majority of trails start from the exhaust gases expelled at the back of the engine.

    The fact that there are many reports of pilots becoming unconscious and passengers getting sick, due to fumes entering the cockpit and cabin, bears testimony to the existence of some highly toxic substances circulating around the fuselage of modern passenger aircraft. The air conditioning units in such planes are powered by the engines.

    What exactly is the composition of the fuel going into these engines?

    A recent study by the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, aimed to ascertain the composition of the exhaust fumes directly they leave the turbines of high flying jet aircraft. What the initial study found was very revealing: there were sixteen different metals detected in the composition of the engine exhaust – and they included aluminium and barium.

    Now anyone with an ounce of intelligence is going to ask why would aluminium and barium be added to commercial jet fuels – not to mention the other fourteen metals.

    We already know that 'overt' spraying is carried out by by specially adapted aircraft into which special tanks and equipment are installed, with spraying nozzles fitted externally. Engineers have photographed such apparatus in the fuselage of planes they have worked on, and these pictures can be found on the net.

    But this form of 'overt' spraying cannot account for the large number of planes which spread the 'covert' aerosol trails that cover our skies, year in year out, from one end of the world to the other.
    There has to be a vast network of internationally interconnected fueling bases involved in order for an operation of this magnitude to be realizable.

    Only a highly sophisticated and globally managed operation could mastermind chemtrail activity on this scale.

    It is highly probable, that standing behind this operation, is the same psychopathic secretive cabal that is behind all such manipulative global missions. Behind all attempts to take control of the planet and exert 'full spectrum dominance' over humanity as a whole.

    A cabal which is familiar with mind control techniques, genetic modification of the food chain and the pharmaceutical repression of natural health. The existence of aluminium as a vaccination adjuvant has already been widely exposed. Its addition to airline fuels has not yet received the same attention – but clearly needs to.

    Barium and strontium, the two other widely identified elements detected in water samplings, have equally damaging and degenerating neurological and internal organ repercussions, on both human and animal health, as well as a dangerously repressive affect on plant health. The almost continuous toxic barrage, which all species are subjected to, represents a direct threat to the gene pool upon which all life on earth is predicated.

    Let's make 2018 the year in which the brutality of chemtrail activity is decisively brought into the foreground of people's attention worldwide; and let's ensure that we can finally name the names of those behind this mass genocide. A genocide affecting every aspect of the unique biological diversity of our beloved and beleaguered planet Earth.

    Foremost in our minds this coming year, should be the need to achieve the complete eradication of
    atmospheric aerosol engineering and an end to the secrecy which enables such heinous projects to ever get off the ground.

    *http://www.i-sis.org.uk/atmosphericGeoengineering.php

    Julian Rose is an early pioneer of UK organic farming, a writer, actor and international activist.
    He is President of the International Coalition to Protect the Polish Countryside. Julian is the author of two acclaimed titles: Changing Course for Life and In Defense of Life, which can be purchased by visiting www.julianrose.info . He has just completed his third book 'Overcoming the Mechanistic Mind' for which he is currently seeking a publisher..

  9. #9
    Vacantly Occupied rincon's Avatar
    Type
    INTP
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    By the beach
    Posts
    686

  10. #10
    Member
    Type
    INFJ
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    960
    Quote Originally Posted by rincon View Post
    are you hiding your face in shame there?

    seeing as geoengineering is the biggest story no one is talking about i'm not surprised!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •