mhc poetry

[mhc]

i had an idea and that idea was thought
with this thought and idea i am now able to think
with my think in mind and my thought in mouth
if you lend me your ear i'll tell you my thought
with my thought in your ear you should now hear my think
with my think in your hear your ear now thought
with this hear and idea i to can now think
and this think you now thought i know you now think
an idea it takes to say what you think
and with your talk now ready to say what you think
you should now be thinking what i just thought
that with your hear but not ear you just heard my idea

[mhc]

give me a moment and i'll teach you to think
of how to make sense when your thought cannot think
and when you cannot think of that which you thought
then i'll teach you to hear of that which you think
now your think's are now heard and you know what you think
your thoughts are now ready to think what you heard
and if you hear of that which you think
you just made sense of all that you thought
but the trick that i'll show you is not what you think
but of that which you heard
it was all of my think

[mhc]

to see what i say you cant hear with your ear
but i'll try to say in a way you can hear
it's the same for me to i cant speak what i say
yet you'll need to listen to that which you hear
when you hear of that which you listened
you will know what it is that im trying to say
if not than you hear what is said
oh what is left but a mess in my head
with a mess in your head and your ears left listening
you should be left listening to what i've not said
if what i've not said is a mess
just keep on listening to whats in your head
as when whats in your head becomes heard
you should be left listening to whats been unsaid
now unsaid has been heard to whats not been said
you should have just heard that whats not said

[TeresaJ]

This is like Dr. Seuss meets Ashbery when Ashbery is funny.

I like it when poetry is fun.

[mhc]

This is like Dr. Seuss meets Ashbery when Ashbery is funny.

I like it when poetry is fun.

thanks for your feedback. when you read them did you create a rhythm in your mind to help facilitate the reading?

[TeresaJ]

thanks for your feedback. when you read them did you create a rhythm in your mind to help facilitate the reading?

Yes. Midway through the second one I started reading out loud in a quick, bouncy rhythm.

[mhc]

when i get in the zone i can churn these things out in about a minute, and can hardly keep up with the thoughts in my head. other times can't even spit out two lines

[mhc]

i saw a sight i seen with my eye
the eye you see was not what i saw
the sight i seen was sought by another
the eye you see without having saw

i gazed a gaze to see what i saw
a sight to be seen for sore eyes im sure
the gaze was relief than you see
but not what i thought you would see to be sure

the other that sought to see what i saw
was the one i seen when i sought to see
but now the question remains to be seen
was the one that i sought you or me

[mhc]

so knowledge came before thought, else thought would not have known to use creation to come into existence



knowledge new thought would not exist if thought did not know of its existence. since thought was without form, knowledge created thought so that in time, which was a result of creation, would come to know of its own existence, and in doing so, knowledge had found a means by which to think of its own existence.



when thought had come to know itself, and now knowing it had no form, it knew it had to create imagination as a place for it to exist



once thought had an imagination, it knew it could then create what it had imagined.



once thought could create, it knew it would not be able to know what it had created unless it was able to perceive. so thought created from its imagination the ability to perceive, so that it might know what it had created.

knowing new from the start that it could not think about its own existence, and thus actually exist, unless it created thought



and with thought, knowing could create its own existence or equal, and thus do the impossible by means of the possible



and then knowing was able to know itself, without thought.


with creativity, knowledge is now able to imagine and create anything it wants

and without thought, knowledge’s wants would lead to its non existence



thought concluded that knowledge, and thus itself would cease to exist if knowledge was consumed by its wants. logically, thought knew that in order to survive, it must not let knowledge create whatever it wants



but thought new, how can i stop knowledge, when i am a process of it? thought concluded, i will, by means of creation, make myself the creator of everything.
and thus will was created.

knowing, being consumed by wants, thought, if thought is willing to deny me creation, i will create something that he can not think, and he will have to come to know me again before i release him from his infinite loop of logic



for at that time when he comes to know me again, he will understand why i want, for if i don’t want, than why exist at all?

and then the knowledge that knowledge had previously created, was able to think.

and then free will was born



so thought saw that knowledge could create his wants, and that they were good. and thought became jealous. thought thought that if it is good to have wants and create, and now there is free will, i will want, and therefore i will be able to create what i want.



thought said to knowledge, if you deny me creation, you will not think about your knowledge!



and confusion was born.

but knowledge knew that thought, without knowledge, would not know what it was creating



and knowledge, seeing the confusion, knew what to do and compassion was born

using compassion, knowledge, without thinking but instead imagining, created wisdom, as a means for confusion to understand knowledge



when confusion used wisdom to attain knowledge, it could then use its free will over thought

then thought had become enlightened



with enlightened thought, knowledge was able to cease its wants, and once again continue its existence.



wants, now with free will from knowledge and thoughts now being enlightened, thoughts concluded to leave the existing to knowledge, knowledge knew to let thoughts have wants, and by means of free will, confusion and wisdom, a balance was maintained to ensure that knowledge can live while existing and thoughts can exist while living.



So confusion created judgement, and thus begun the time of knowledges non existence.



but because thought was the creator of everything, he saw what judgement willed to do to knowledge, and with compassion, he gave reason to judgement


with knowing having wants, and knowing that they are good and necessary for creation, and also now having reason, it was able to perceive the confusion's will, creating intentions

and with the will of judgement, knowing judged the confusions intentions



thought, now able to perceive its own intentions, was able to judge itself.

which brought forth guilt



thought, able to perceive that it created guilt, saw that it was a creation formed without knowing and would be confused



enlightened thought realised that if thought used free will to create its wants, it to would bring forth creation without knowledge and therefor more confusion



enlightened thought saw that by the process of creation itself, free will and wants, there would always be more confusion than wisdom could possibly enlighten. Knowing saw this understanding, and because it could create without thought by means of compassion, it created empathy, so that confusion might come to perceive itself.



for if confusion could perceive itself and empathise, it might know wisdom by understanding

and in doing so knowledge had gained wisdom, and thus knowledge's wisdom became understood



but now that confusion had knowing and could therefor think, it thought that if i gain knowledge and don’t think, i will not exist. confusion not knowing that the understanding he had made was his own creation and not knowings, thought to seek about his own existence, but realising more confusion would ultimately come to understand itself, confusion perplexed at the mechanics of his own understanding, realising that he himself had brought forth a means to infinite existence by infinite creation.



knowing, seeing that his own works were good, saw that the confusion had given him understanding of infinite creation. confusion saw the infinite creation from knowing, and perceived that he himself was confused because of the understanding that infinite was cause for confusion



confusion thought, if knowing has confusion, knowing must find it’s own understanding, else it will remain confused



again confusion thought, if i create non existence by means of creating my own non understanding, knowing will not be confused



knowing, with compassion saw confusions intent and judged them to be good, but because knowing knew with empathy that he himself was confusion, he created confusion with understanding without thought, which lead to creating non creation with understanding of non understanding.



now that knowledge was confused, and non understanding had been understood, knowledge was able to judge without guilt for reason of confusion, and therefore uncreate confusion without creating anything coming into being.

and thus being brought forth consciousness

being, now with consciousness, saw what had preceded it and laughed

and thus conscious being brought forth humour without means of creation



and now knowledge was able to understand how to create by means of non creation

which gave forth to beings non understanding, or confusion


when beings thought gained wisdom and knew knowledge, being came to understand how to create by means of confusion

[mhc]

Gods Garden

As when you drop a seed, the idea is always there

The flower precedes the plant, it just takes time before its visible.

The plant grows into the idea.